Ecological importance of bryophyte.
Ecological importance of bryophyte.
Bryophytes are the amphibian member of plant kingdom, which are also known as moss. Unlike most of the higher plants bryophytes are found in groups of individual and they never form any mechanical tissue. Bryophyte often play in the economy of nature, as ecological indicator, medicinal raw materials and many other aspects. Bryophytes are important constituent of ecosystem in temperate and tropical region of earth. They are ecologically important because of following reasons
1.Bryophytes and plant succession: Among
the bryophytes the mosses are considered to potent forms of successional
process. They colonize over the nutrient
poor sides, where no other plant can
survive. After death and decay they form humus and increase the soil fertility.Some important species
under this category are- Cephalozia media, Lepidozia septans, Pellia epiphylla
etc.
2.Bryophytes and anatomical succession:In
association of plant succession, they participate in faunal succession.For example moss cushions developing on rock, first colonized by Rhizopods,
Rotifers, Nematodes and Ciliates. As a thicker decomposition of the fauna
become similar to that of the soil
fauna.
3.Bryophytes a ovipositor: The animals
which feed on bryophyte also deposits their egg in bryophyte thallus. Slugs and snails are frequently depositing
their eggs upon gametophores. Some water beetles spent their dormancy period within the leaves of bryophytes.
4.
Bryophytes as ion exchanger: The
cell wall of Sphagnum, functions as ion exchanger . They rapidly absorb cation such as Ca+2,
Mg+2 etc, supplied by rain water and in exchange release hydrogen ions in to the water.
Hydrogen ion make the soil acidic and maintain the acidic environment of soil.
5.Maintanance of water balance in forest:
In forest, especially in the tropical forest Sphagnum and few other bryophytes
absorb huge amount of water and maintain
humidity over dry period and thus preventing rapid run off and folding.
6.Conservation
of soil and prevention of soil erosion: On bare and disturbed soil,
bryophytes act as pioneer community and they have the ability to stabilize
soil.The soil in semi arid regions are held in place by crusts predominantly
composed of bryophytes and thus
preventing the soil from blowing away. N. G.
Miller (1981) found that bryophytes
increase the buffering capacity of soil, particularly against the changes
normally caused by addition of fertilizer. The slow decomposition of many
bryophyte taxa makes them suitable for long-lasting mulch. When Sphagnum is
spread over the ground or mixed with soil, it retains moisture and prevents
weed growth; it also discourages damping-off fungi (H. Miller and N. G. Miller
1979).
7.Nitrogen Fixation:Nitrogen is
often a limiting nutrient for plant growth, especially in agriculture.
Bryophyte crusts, endowed with nitrogen-fixing Cyanobacteria, can contribute
considerable soil nitrogen, particularly to dry rangeland soils. Some of these
Cyanobacteria behave symbiotically in Anthoceros (D. K. Saxena 1981), taking nitrogen from
the atmosphere and converting it to ammonia and amino acids. The excess fixed
nitrogen is released to the substrate where it can be used by other organisms. K. T.
Harper and J. R. Marble (1988) found that bryophyte crusts not only help
protect soil from wind and water erosion, and provide homes for nitrogen-fixing
organisms, but they facilitate absorption and retentionof water as well.
8. UV-B Radiation: The moss Bryum argenteum is
being used to monitor the thickness of the ozone layer over Antarctica (L.
Hedenas 1991). As the ozone layer decreased, increased exposure to UV-B
radiation stimulated production of flavonoids in this species. But, as with
ozone exposure, responses vary considerably among species. In Sphagnum magellanicum
there were no significant differences in chlorophyll or carotenoid
concentrations following UV-B exposure; nevertheless, exposure increased its
growth in height without a corresponding increase in voltric density, resulting
in no effect on biomass (P. S. Searles et al. 2002).
Comments
Post a Comment